Threat modeling sprints
Structured sessions on data flows, trust boundaries, and abuse cases for APIs, admin tools, and mobile clients. Output: prioritized findings tied to components your engineers own.
Neofy Matrix Software Consulting
Application security engineering for teams that ship code under real attack pressure—not checkbox audits.
Neofy Matrix Software Consulting Co., Ltd. · Unified Business Number (UBN): 78876203 · Representative: Wei-Lin Liu
Myths that stall secure delivery
Security work is often framed as a gate at the end of a sprint. For application security engineering, that timing guarantees expensive rework. We align reviews with how your team actually builds: design decisions, dependency choices, auth flows, and release paths.
Below are three engagement shapes we run from Kaohsiung for distributed product teams—each scoped as project-based consulting with clear deliverables, not open-ended staff augmentation unless you ask for it.
Focused code review
Line-level review on authentication, authorization, cryptography usage, and input handling in your stack—not generic OWASP slides.
Implementation support
Pairing with your developers to land fixes: token lifetimes, secrets handling, CI checks, and safer defaults in frameworks you already use.
How an engagement runs
Every project starts with constraints you already have—regulatory context, release date, stack, and existing controls. We document assumptions instead of pretending your environment is a greenfield lab.
Intake and scope
You share repositories, architecture notes, and the incidents or review gaps that triggered the request. We propose a written scope with boundaries: what is in, what is explicitly out, and expected artifacts.
Technical work
Reviews and working sessions follow the scope—threat models, secure design feedback, or implementation pairing. Findings are recorded with severity, affected assets, and reproduction hints your team can act on.
Readout and handoff
We walk through results with engineering leads, clarify remediation options, and leave a durable report. Optional follow-up blocks cover verification after fixes land.
Commercial close
Fees and payment timing are agreed before work begins. If you need a formal quote for procurement, we provide it after intake—not from a self-serve checkout on this site.
Who this is for—and who it is not
We work with product engineering groups that maintain production services and can grant read access to code and staging environments. Ideal fits include backend teams shipping APIs, fintech or health-adjacent products with heightened scrutiny, and maintainers inheriting legacy auth.
We are a poor fit if you need a one-day certificate for a slide deck, unlimited on-call coverage without a scope, or a replacement for your internal security function. We also do not sell scanning tools or managed SOC services.
Clarification: “Application security” here means engineering judgment on how software behaves when abused—not slogans about “zero trust” without mapping controls to your codebase.
Do you replace our penetration test vendor?
Often no. Pen tests validate exposure from the outside; we focus on design and code-level weaknesses your team can fix before an annual test. We can coordinate with your existing testers if scopes overlap.
Which languages and frameworks?
Common stacks include TypeScript/Node, Java/Kotlin services, Python APIs, and mobile clients. Tell us what you run; we decline engagements where we cannot review primary languages responsibly.
Where are you based?
We operate from 802 Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, working remotely with teams across time zones. On-site workshops are available by arrangement.